Bush's support among Democrats and liberals has always been exceedingly low, falling somewhere in the teens or low 20s as a percentage of the overall group. [And who those 15-percenters could possibly be that support the boob-in-chief is beyond me.]
Among independents, while there were perhaps, maybe, 50% willing to take a flyer on Dubya after 9/11, most fell away long ago. This left
What I find fascinating (and deplorable) is that even as Bush has watched his support evaporate among reality-based Americans, the reasons those on the right have abandoned him are not the same reasons most thinking Americans rejected this president long ago.
If you're to ask a one-time hard-core Bush supporter from the right why they've turned against the Decider, it's not the War; it's not Katrina; it's not the civil liberties abuses; it's not the attorney general/US attorney scandal; it's not the rank hypocrisy of Clear Skies or Healthy Forests or No Child Left Behind; it's not Abu Gahrib or Walter Reed or the lying or the manipulating or the 3728 dead troops.
No, the reason most conservatives have rejected Bush is because... [check yourself here, prepare for spit take] he's TOO LIBERAL.
These are people without a political soul. These are people for whom victory is the only reward. As a result, they can reject George Bush as too liberal, while at the same time supporting people like Rudy Giuliani, Newt Gingrich, Mitt Romney and Fred Thompson, each of whom from a practical standpoint holds political positions that should be anathema to any self-respecting conservative (Christian or otherwise). For these people, victory is the only goal, principles be damned.
They should all go to hell in the same handbasket.
No comments:
Post a Comment