Received this email from me Ma this afternoon:
"[A] thought for consideration: if you and I vote for Obama, and Dad and Doriana vote for Hillary, (Dad did already) we will cancel each other out!"
T asks in the comments:
I'm just wondering if the Republicans or people on the fence will vote for a Clinton. It seems like Obama might have a better chance against the Republican candidate because a lot of people might hate the Clintons. what do you think?
Well, Democracy is messy that way, isn't it?
This is truly the most amazing presidential primary season in
my voting life. I've often told people that they should read Hunter S. Thompson's "Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail" if they want to get a good feel for the horse race (and horse trading) aspects of presidential politics, but there will surely be some great books coming out of Campaign 2008.
Now, that's a pretty a good point up there about the vote cancellation angle (better known as "the Nader effect"), but T's on to something as well and here's my real fear about tomorrow, and the near future of Democratic politics: If Hillary gets the nomination, it's certain to put a strong wind in the sails of right-wing gasbags like Rush Limbaugh and Sean Hannity. It'll be non-stop rancor for months and months! A new lease on life for Fox News and Bill O'Reilly. And it'll probably draw every Clinton-hater from Bakersfield to Birmingham, Alabama, to the polls, just to vote against her. There are people who would likely stay home if the choice is between Obama and McCain, but if Hillary's on the ballot, they'd part the Red Sea and crawl through broken glass to pull the lever against her.
Additionally, should Hillary actually win the election in November, just imagine how totally miserable the next four years will be with the nutcases attacking her -- and Bill -- for EVERY SINGLE THING they do.
Do we really want to go through all that again? It would be relentless, ugly and completely mind-numbing.
That said, it is totally unfair to Hillary to make an electoral decision based on those possibilities. If she's the best candidate, if she's the person you want to win, if she represents your views, if she's proven to you that she's the most qualified, best prepared candidate, then she deserves your vote, regardless of what that means to the other side. I'm telling you, right here, as a loyal C-SPAN viewer who's watched several Hillary speeches from beginning to end, who's watched more debates than most,
she knows her stuff. She is totally on top of it. And I even -- gasp! -- believe in her sincerety.
Obama is great on the stump. He can really lift your spirits and set your heart to soaring. He can make you stomp your feet and he can bring a tear to your eye. But he rarely talks about anything concrete. He doesn't break down the numbers. He doesn't, that I've seen, ever really give you anything to sink your teeth into. He's inspirational, absolutely, but he's treading the same ground John Edwards did, without
half the substance Edwards offered. I'm afraid you can't run the United States of America on HOPE and a DREAM. That ain't the way it is. [Holy cow, did I just talk myself out of voting for Obama?!? But I love that guy!]
So I go back and forth. Either one of these contenders would be great, and when's the last time we had the luxury of not being able to decide between two such excellent candidates? This is a really hard choice.
Alas, 14 hours to go and I'm still on the fence.